ArticleScientific reports2026
Endophytic Beauveria bassiana in maize: influence of genotype, fungal source, inoculation methods, and time on colonization and fitness of Fall armyworm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endophytic Entomopathogenic Fungi Shape Herbivore Behavior and Plant-Insect Interactions: Implications for Biological Control.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated how Beauveria bassiana isolate origin and maize genotype affect endophytic colonization and suppression of the Fall armyworm (FAW). The objectives were to determine whether isolate origin (insect or soil-derived) influences colonization across maize tissues, assess the role of four genotypes (two landraces and two improved lines), and evaluate FAW fitness on colonized plants. Three indigenous isolates, two insect-derived (Bb11, Bb115) and one soil-derived (DL1.1), were applied to four maize genotypes. These included two landraces (Kokoli Daneri, Ovinonboe) and two improved varieties (Faaba QPM, TZL Composite 4W Benin). Inoculation was performed using foliar spraying and seed coating. Colonization declined over time but varied significantly with isolate, genotype, and tissue type (p < 0.0001). Insect-derived isolates achieved higher colonization, particularly in stems and roots of landraces, indicating genotype-dependent compatibility. Bb115 achieved systemic colonization in Kokoli Daneri leaves at 7 days after inoculation. Feeding assays showed that FAW larvae fed on colonized plants had reduced survival, lower larval and pupal weights, and reduced adult fecundity and emergence. FAW fitness was assessed using corrected larval mortality, larval and pupal weight and size, adult emergence, and reproduction (adult emergence, fecundity). The reduction of fitness remained moderate and was more pronounced in landrace and insect isolate combinations. These results emphasize the importance of fungal isolate, maize genotype, inoculation method, and timing in enhancing endophytic biocontrol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.