Observational studyScientific reports2026
Effectiveness of low-dose perampanel in focal epilepsy patients aged twelve or older in Southern China: an observational study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This real-world study from southern China retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness, tolerability, and retention of low-dose perampanel (PER 2–6 mg) in focal epilepsy and explored associated clinical factors. Based on the steady-state maintenance dose of PER (2, 4, or 6 mg/day), 190 patients were enrolled from July 2020 to August 2023. Outcomes included seizure reduction, responder rates (≥ 50% reduction), adverse events (AEs), and retention at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. At 12 months, seizure frequency reductions were 100% (2 mg), 91% (4 mg), and 82.5% (6 mg). Efficacy rates at 12 months were 44.6% (2 mg), 50% (4 mg), and 66.8% (6 mg) (P = 0.168). Exploratory analyses suggested a higher responder rate with 6 mg versus 2 mg in patients with disease duration ≥ 5 years or focal seizures only (P = 0.023; P = 0.044). Multivariable analysis indicated that a lower number of concomitant ASMs was independently associated with better early response (6-month), while a shorter disease duration (< 5 years) was associated with better long-term (12-month) response, independent of the specific dose within the 2–6 mg range. AE incidence was lowest with 2 mg (14.3%) versus 4 mg (24.1%) and 6 mg (23.9%). Respective 12-month retention rates were 32.2, 46.8, and 58.6%. In conclusion, this study suggests that low-dose PER (2–6 mg) can achieve favorable short- and long-term seizure control in focal epilepsy patients aged ≥ 12 years, with a good tolerability profile. The benefits were particularly pronounced in those with a shorter disease duration (< 5 years) and those receiving monotherapy or early add-on therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.