ArticleScientific reports2026
A vision transformer model for the detection of glaucoma from optic disc photographs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Accuracy: A Controlled Comparative Glaucoma Screening Benchmark Across Deep Learning and Hybrid Models Under Within- and Cross-Dataset Conditions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study uses a deep learning algorithm to analyze optic disc photographs (ODPs) and classify eyes as glaucomatous or healthy based on optic nerve appearance. ODPs from three databases were independently graded by two glaucoma specialists. Images were preprocessed using the open-source language R and RimNet, a deep learning model for optic disc segmentation, to prepare inputs for training. The model was developed with Python based on Google's Vision Transformer (ViT). After assessing the ODPs, the model provided an output between 0 and 1 to predict glaucoma likelihood (≥ 0.5 signified glaucoma). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), where 1 indicates perfect classification. A total of 1,432 glaucomatous eyes with a mean MD of - 2.09 dB were analyzed using the model. The model achieved AUCs of 1.00, 0.98, and 1.00 in the training, validation, and test phases respectively. Overall accuracy in test images was 0.987, sensitivity was 0.994, and specificity was 0.969 with grader labels as the ground truth. A later assessment using 956 advanced glaucomatous eyes (MD < - 6 dB) with a mean MD of - 11.71 reached 99.9% accuracy. The model demonstrated high accuracy in detecting glaucomatous optic nerve damage from ODPs. The model's strong potential for early disease detection suggests that deep learning can be a valuable, cost-effective tool in glaucoma screening, especially in resource-limited regions. Our study demonstrates the potential of deep learning in providing accessible, early-stage glaucoma detection, supporting global efforts to prevent vision loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.