ArticleScientific reports2026
Data-driven springback prediction of curved metal sections in curtain wall systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Curtain wall systems (CWS) are essential components of modern architecture, yet their metal sections exhibit high slenderness ratios, complex multi-curvature geometries, and shape specificity. These characteristics make such components prone to springback after machining, adversely affecting dimensional accuracy and construction quality. Reliable springback prediction is critical, but conventional finite element method (FEM)-based approaches are computationally inefficient when applied to large-scale and diverse components. To overcome this limitation, this study proposes a data-driven springback prediction framework for curved metal sections that integrates numerical simulation, data augmentation, and machine learning model. Experimental validation demonstrates that the proposed framework achieves robust prediction performance, with an average coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.