ArticleNature communications2026
Contrasting selective signatures of gene expression plasticity in response to antifungal clotrimazole and common environmental stresses in yeast.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phenotypic plasticity plays a key role in adaptation to fluctuating environments. However, its evolutionary significance remains debated, with conflicting views on whether it is actively maintained by natural selection or a neutral consequence of molecular constraints. In this study, we examine the evolutionary role of gene expression plasticity in yeast populations exposed to both common, ancestrally experienced stressors (NaCl and heat at 37 °C) and a novel stressor (the antifungal drug clotrimazole). Using mutation accumulation lines to separate the effects of natural selection from genetic drift, we compare gene expression responses (referred to as plastic change) between 22 natural strains, 15 mutation accumulation lines, and their progenitor under non-stressed and stressed conditions. Our results show that, in the antifungal environment, gene expression plasticity is selectively maintained, as indicated by its reduction in magnititude, reversal in directionality, and loss of stress-responsive pathways in mutation accumulation lines. In contrast, plasticity under the common stress conditions appears largely neutral, with random variation across mutation accumulation lines. This study provides direct evidence of the adaptive role of gene expression plasticity in response to novel stressors and offers insights into the molecular mechanisms driving these adaptive responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.