ArticleNature communications2026
A high-throughput conditioned-media-based screening system identifies inhibitors of aggregation induced by iPSC-secreted amyloid β.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In early drug discovery, in vitro screening is frequently used, but selected candidates often fail in vivo. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based disease models offer improved physiological relevance; however, the high costs of media and differentiation procedures limit large-scale testing. Here, we develop a high-throughput conditioned-media-based screening system-the High-throughput screening technology for Aggregation Inhibitors of Diseased cell-derived Aggregative Proteins (HaiDap) system-to identify inhibitors of aggregation induced by iPSC-secreted amyloid β (Aβ). Using conditioned media derived from differentiated iPSCs of a male Alzheimer's disease patient, we screen extracts from 22 edible plants. Whereas PBS-based assays showed 40.9% (9/22) apparent selectivity, the HaiDap system demonstrates higher specificity (13.6%; 3/22). All three identified extracts (O. aristatus, S. aromaticum, and G. yesoense) significantly delay Aβ aggregation on neuronal surfaces in an iPSC-based assay. These findings suggest that the HaiDap system enables efficient, accurate, and low-cost screening of amyloid aggregation inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.