ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
Limitations of Common Molecular Markers in Fungal Biodiversity Analysis and the Benefits of Their Synergistic Use.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Morphology and Multigene Phylogeny Reveal Six New Species ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput sequencing of the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) regions is the primary method for estimating fungal diversity from environmental DNA. However, reliance solely on ITS markers is complicated by its high variability in sequence length and the presence of multiple variants within a single genome, which can bias diversity estimates. This study compares the performance of the ITS1 and ITS2 molecular markers with five alternative markers targeting protein-coding genes using a defined mock community of 413 fungal species from 32 orders. We show that none of the markers provided a reliable estimate of fungal diversity and two failed to produce sufficient data. While the ITS2 marker showed the highest proportion of individual species detections at 75.3%, a multi-marker approach significantly improved this result. Combining the top three markers (ITS1, ITS2 and elongation factor 1-alpha gene) increased this number to 92.2%. This approach also provided a crucial corrective for relative sequence abundance (RSA) estimates, as combining markers helps to offset the individual biases of each of them resulting in a more balanced picture of the community composition. Although the ITS region remains a cornerstone in fungal metabarcoding studies, we recommend combining both ITS1 and ITS2 markers with at least one alternative DNA marker to achieve more accurate species richness and RSA estimates. The broader application of these alternative markers will depend on the continued development of comprehensive, curated reference databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.