Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41876162›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Strengthening and Targeted Rehabilitation for Optimal Neuromuscular Gains for chronic BACK pain (STRONG-BACK): protocol for a randomised controlled trial in participants with primary nociceptive pain drivers.

Maryse Fortin, Brent Rosenstein, Cleo Bertrand, Nicolas Vaillancourt, Alicia Wright, Chanelle Montpetit, Luciana Macedo, James Elliott, Chad E Cook, Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Maryse FortinHealth, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada maryse.fortin@concordia.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1189-3591
Brent RosensteinHealth, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Cleo BertrandHealth, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nicolas VaillancourtHealth, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Alicia WrightHealth, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Chanelle MontpetitHealth, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Luciana MacedoSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1840-2951
James ElliottThe University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Chad E CookDepartment of Orthopedics, Duke University, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Yannick Tousignant-LaflammeSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Jinhui MaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8033-1699
M Gabrielle PagéAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7742-2717
Geoffrey DoverHealth, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Thien Thanh Dang-VuHealth, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Michael H WeberMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExercise therapy is the most recommended treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP), with evidence supporting modest effects, likely due to the heterogeneity of patient presentations. Evidence suggests that matching individuals to the most appropriate exercise type could improve outcomes. Systematic reviews also emphasise that effective exercise interventions should be patient centred, target paraspinal muscle health and be of sufficient duration. This study addresses these gaps using a targeted care approach to identify a homogenous sample that is more likely to respond to our interventions. The inclusion of a sample with predominant nociceptive pain profile will be performed with the integration of the Pain and Disability Drivers Management Model (PDDM) and the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire (LSIQ). The primary aim of this two-arm randomised controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of motor control plus isolated lumbar extension exercises (MC+ILEX, arm 1) to free-weight resistance training (arm 2) in reducing LBP-related disability. Secondary aims include examining whether changes in multifidus composition mediate disability improvements comparing intervention effects on muscle size and quality, strength, mobility, pain, quality of life, sleep, physical activity and satisfaction; exploring baseline LSIQ scores and sex/gender as moderators of treatment response; and investigating participants' perceptions and experiences of exercise therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 106 participants will be recruited through primary and secondary care and randomised (1:1) to receive either MC+ILEX or free-weight resistance training. Both groups will complete 48 exercise sessions over 16 weeks. The primary outcome will be disability at 16 weeks, measured by the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes include multifidus muscle composition and size, lumbar and gluteal muscle strength, hip range of motion, pain, physical and mental function, satisfaction and recovery, health-related quality of life, sleep quality and physical activity levels. Linear mixed-effects models will be used to assess primary and secondary outcomes. Regression analyses will explore whether baseline LSIQ scores moderate treatment effects on multifidus composition and other outcomes. A subsample of participants will undergo semistructured interviews before and after the intervention to explore their illness perceptions, illness mindsets, perceptions of exercise therapy, as well as their experiences and satisfaction with the two exercise interventions. Reflexive thematic analysis will be used to analyse qualitative data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethics approval from the Central Ethics Research Committee of the Quebec Minister of Health and Social Services (CCER-25-26-14). Results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14864451.

Indexed as

Chronic PainExercise TherapyLow Back PainParaspinal MusclesResistance TrainingAdultDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMuscle StrengthPain MeasurementQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBack painPUBLIC HEALTHRADIOLOGY & IMAGINGREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID41876162
PMCPMC13034384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.