Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41876159›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Interfaces between communication, education and health: a scoping review protocol.

Natalia Araújo do Nascimento Batista, Susana Henriques, Juciano Lacerda, Aline de Pinho Dias, Almudena Muñoz Gallego, Danielle Correia Neves Abreu, Heleni Aires Clemente, José Manuel Emiliano Bidarra de Almeida, Kaline Sampaio de Araújo, Karilany Dantas Coutinho and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Natalia Araújo do Nascimento BatistaLaboratory for Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil natalia.araujo@lais.huol.ufrn.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4836-5298
Susana HenriquesDistance Education and eLearning Laboratory, Universidade Aberta, Lisbon, Portugal.
Juciano LacerdaDepartment of Social Communication, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Aline de Pinho DiasLaboratory for Technological Innovation in Health; Education Graduate Program, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Almudena Muñoz GallegoDepartment of Applied Communications Sciences, Faculty of Information Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Danielle Correia Neves AbreuMedia Studies Graduate Program, Department of Communication, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Heleni Aires ClementeFaculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
José Manuel Emiliano Bidarra de AlmeidaDistance Education and eLearning Laboratory, Universidade Aberta, Lisbon, Portugal.
Kaline Sampaio de AraújoLaboratory for Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Karilany Dantas CoutinhoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering; Laboratory for Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Lucía Sanjuán NúñezSocial and Culture Anthropology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Manoel Honorio RomãoLaboratory for Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Maria da Guia Cunha Dantas FreireCommunication Sciences Doctorate Program, ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mirian Estela Nogueira TavaresArts and Communication Research Centre; Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, University of Algarve, Faro, Faro District, Portugal.
Mônica Karina Santos ReisLaboratory for Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Nicolás Lorite GarcíaDepartment of Advertising, Public Relations and Audiovisual Communication, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ricardo ValentimLaboratory for Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9216-8593

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe interfaces between the fields of communication, education and health have been indicated by international institutions such as the WHO and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. However, hegemonic scientific practices supersede dialogue between the three fields, isolating their practices. This fragmenting tendency is observed in scientific literature, which has created gaps in the dialogue and articulation between communication, education and health. Although health promotion requires both communicative and educational practices, the epistemological, historical, political, cultural and socioeconomic aspects have also engendered tensions between the fields. Communication is often seen as a mere instrument for other practices, rather than a phenomenon that (re)produces meanings and power dynamics. In opposing the reductionist and instrumentalising perspectives of knowledge fields, the primary objective of the scoping review is to map the scientific evidence on the interfaces between communication and education in health to indicate a conceptual framework that articulates communication and education practices within the context of health. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A transdisciplinary team developed this protocol based on the 2024 Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The procedures required to conduct the review were guided by the frameworks proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, Levac ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The nature of the research and the use of secondary data sources do not require informed consent forms or approval from ethics committees in Brazil. The scientific findings from the review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, academic conferences and other scientific communication channels. STUDY REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z3CX7.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicCommunication practiceEducational practiceHealth CommunicationHealth Education

Identifiers

PMID41876159
PMCPMC13052738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.