ArticleAnnals of family medicine2026
When High Scores Hide Realities: Enhancing Patient Survey Data Through Joint Display.
Article in Annals of family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatient surveys often include closed- and open-ended responses that are usually reported separately, and links between them rarely explored, limiting interpretive depth. We outline a strategy that integrates quantitative and qualitative survey data in a joint display which enables combined analysis and findings to inform and improve programs for patients.
methodsData were drawn from a patient experience survey implemented in Alberta's long COVID Inter-professional Outpatient Program (IPOP). A joint display of Likert-scale satisfaction ratings and themed open-text feedback was developed to examine connections between the structured responses and qualitative insights.
resultsWe integrated quantitative survey satisfaction ratings with themes from the qualitative analysis of open-text comments in a joint display. Examining these data sets together added an analytical layer and uncovered nuanced experiences not evident in Likert-scale responses alone. By aligning satisfaction scores with themes, the joint display surfaced contradictory and paradoxical findings that would otherwise be hidden.
conclusionsAligning Likert-scale responses with thematic analysis of open-text reveals subtleties that may be obscured by scores alone. Understanding the narratives behind ratings is essential to evaluate health care programming, particularly when surveys are the primary mechanism for incorporating patient voices into service planning and delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.