Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41875922›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie2026

[Women in Gastroenterology - Current Status from a German Survey: Why Waiting Is Not an Option].

Sandra Nagl, Ana Dugic, Yarema Okhrin, René Barnickel, Ulrike Denzer

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandra NaglUniversitätsklinikum Augsburg, III. Medizinische Klinik, BY, Germany, Augsburg.ORCID 0000-0001-9217-390X
Ana DugicUniversität Heidelberg Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg, Innere Medizin IV, BW, Germany, Heidelberg.
Yarema OkhrinUniversität Augsburg, Lehrstuhl für Statistik und Data Science, BY, Germany, Augsburg.
René BarnickelDeutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, HE, Germany, Marburg.
Ulrike DenzerUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg - Standort Marburg, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Endokrinologie und Stoffwechsel, HE, Germany, Marburg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the increasing proportion of female medical students and physicians, gender-specific disparities persist in gastroenterology and endoscopy, particularly with regard to leadership positions. The aim of this study was to analyze gender-related differences and perceived structural barriers in Germany. Materials and Methods: In February 2025, all members of the German Society for Gastroenterology (DGVS) were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey comprising 16 standardized questions. Data were collected on professional practice acitivity, training status, endoscopic practice, and continuing medical education, with a focus on gender-specific differences. Results: A total of 685 DGVS members participated. Men were significantly more likely to hold leadership positions (15.33% vs. 5.58%, p=0.0002). Women more frequently worked part-time (43.12% vs. 15.33%, p<0.0001) and performed complex interventional endoscopic procedures less often (p<0.0001). In addition, women reported significantly higher dissatisfaction with their endoscopic training (42.38% vs. 20.92%, p<0.0001), primarily due to family responsibilities and challenges balancing work and family life. Conclusion: This study demonstrates persistent gender disparities in gastroenterology. Targeted structural interventions and improved models for reconciling professional and family responsibilities are needed to ensure gender equity and support women's career progression.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceGastroenterologyPhysicians, WomenSexismAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleGermanyHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedSex Distribution

Identifiers

PMID41875922
PMCPMC13288412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.