ArticleZeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie2026
[Women in Gastroenterology - Current Status from a German Survey: Why Waiting Is Not an Option].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the increasing proportion of female medical students and physicians, gender-specific disparities persist in gastroenterology and endoscopy, particularly with regard to leadership positions. The aim of this study was to analyze gender-related differences and perceived structural barriers in Germany. Materials and Methods: In February 2025, all members of the German Society for Gastroenterology (DGVS) were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey comprising 16 standardized questions. Data were collected on professional practice acitivity, training status, endoscopic practice, and continuing medical education, with a focus on gender-specific differences. Results: A total of 685 DGVS members participated. Men were significantly more likely to hold leadership positions (15.33% vs. 5.58%, p=0.0002). Women more frequently worked part-time (43.12% vs. 15.33%, p<0.0001) and performed complex interventional endoscopic procedures less often (p<0.0001). In addition, women reported significantly higher dissatisfaction with their endoscopic training (42.38% vs. 20.92%, p<0.0001), primarily due to family responsibilities and challenges balancing work and family life. Conclusion: This study demonstrates persistent gender disparities in gastroenterology. Targeted structural interventions and improved models for reconciling professional and family responsibilities are needed to ensure gender equity and support women's career progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.