ReviewAmerican journal of botany2026
Shaped by context: Evolutionary trajectories of desiccation tolerance in land plants.
Review in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An IDA peptide from Boea hygrometrica enhances desiccation tolerance but lacks activity in Arabidopsis.Planta · 2026Article
- Shaped by context: Evolutionary trajectories of desiccation tolerance in land plants.American journal of botany · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Desiccation tolerance (DT), the ability to survive near-complete cellular dehydration, is widespread in diaspores but rare in the vegetative tissues of land plants. The patchy and punctuated phylogenetic distribution of vegetative desiccation tolerance (VDT) suggests that the trait is both ancient and recurrent, yet the evolutionary trajectories remain unresolved. Here, we synthesize evidence across land plants to propose a framework for the evolution of VDT in embryophytes. We build on the current understanding of VDT as an ancestral trait, present in the gametophyte of early land plants. The transition to sporophyte dominance and resulting homiohydry in vascular plants coincides with the widespread loss of VDT, likely driven by relaxed selection for VDT, coupled with new structural constraints and anatomical innovations that facilitated water acquisition, transport, and retention. The core molecular modules of DT were retained in the diaspores of most land plants, where they served as evolutionary refugia for the essential building blocks of the trait. Some species later reestablished VDT by co-opting deeply conserved diaspore modules and evolving key anatomical innovations to support them. We argue that such reestablishments of VDT are dependent on both anatomical predispositions as well as exposure to key selective pressures and ecological filters. We conclude that VDT is not a simple presence-absence trait, but rather a modular system, subject to anatomical constraints and contingent on the ecological context. Ultimately, we suggest that VDT serves as an elegant example of how complex traits emerge, persist, and shift across time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.