ArticleJACC. Advances2026
Direct-to-Participant Enrollment in a Virtual Trial: Lessons Learned From the Heartline Study.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04276441 (HEARTLINE - A Heart Health Study Using Digital Technology to Investigate if Early AF Diagnosis Reduces the Risk of Thromboembolic Events Like Stroke IN the Real-world Environment), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
HEARTLINE - A Heart Health Study Using Digital Technology to Investigate if Early AF Diagnosis Reduces the Risk of Thromboembolic Events Like Stroke IN the Real-world Environment
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translational human gut microbiome research: What are the missing pieces of the puzzle?Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDecentralized clinical trials using direct-to-participant recruitment can potentially engage large, representative participant pools.
objectivesThe objective of the study was to share insights on multichannel strategies for participant recruitment in the decentralized Heartline Study, a randomized trial testing the impact of a mobile application-based heart health program with the electrocardiogram and Irregular Rhythm Notification features on an Apple Watch for early diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of atrial fibrillation.
methodsEligible participants were U.S. adults aged ≥65 years with an iPhone and Medicare coverage. Multiple pathways for broad outreach were explored, including digital (eg, email, social media) and traditional channels (eg, direct mail, community outreach). Recruitment efforts were assessed and refined throughout the study to maximize reach.
resultsAcross multiple channels, 321,272 Heartline Study applications were installed, with 34,244 participants (11%) completing enrollment (February 2020-December 2022) and 82% (28,155/34,244) completing baseline demographic assessments. Women accounted for 54.2% (15,258/28,155) of study participants; 93.0% identified as White (26,192/28,155), 2.8% Asian (781/28,155), 2.7% Black (747/28,155), and 2.5% Hispanic (699/28,155). Broad geographic representation throughout the United States was achieved.
conclusionsThe Heartline Study demonstrated the ability to recruit large numbers of participants aged ≥65 years. A direct-to-participant approach across multiple channels achieved excellent gender and geographic diversity, enrolling a higher percentage of women than typical cardiology trials and participation from rural areas. However, less racial and ethnic representation was achieved, highlighting the need for additional strategies to meet this goal. Future trials may consider such multichannel recruitment approaches to support decentralized clinical trials. (A Study to Investigate if Early Atrial Fibrillation [AF] Diagnosis Reduces Risk of Events Like Stroke in the Real-World; NCT04276441).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.