ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Challenges of Standard Pediatric Epilepsy Monitoring and the Potential Benefits of Contactless Sensor Technologies: Exploratory Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epilepsy is a common neurological condition in children, and accurate detection of seizures and their frequency is essential for diagnosis and treatment. Standard monitoring using electroencephalography alongside clinical observation is often burdensome in pediatric settings, as electrodes can cause discomfort and restrict mobility. Contactless sensor technologies may offer a promising supplement by enabling monitoring without physical contact. Objective: This study aims to explore challenges in standard pediatric epilepsy monitoring from the perspective of health care professionals and examines the potential benefits and requirements of supplementary contactless sensor technologies in this setting. Methods: Participant observation of routine processes in standard pediatric epilepsy monitoring was conducted at a German university hospital. Field notes from 40 observed procedures were analyzed using structuring content analysis. Building on these findings, a focus group with pediatric neurologists, nurses, and medical technical assistants (n=6) explored the potential benefits and implementation requirements of contactless sensor technologies. Focus group data were analyzed using focus group illustration maps. Results: A reference workflow of standard pediatric epilepsy monitoring was derived, revealing psychosocial, medical, and organizational challenges faced by health care professionals. Electroencephalography recordings and clinical observation required considerable reassurance of patients and parents or carers, were vulnerable to movement artifacts and incomplete seizure documentation, and were labor- and resource-intensive. Focus group participants viewed contactless sensor technologies as a potentially valuable supplement by enabling continuous long-term monitoring with minimal additional burden. Conclusions: By identifying challenges associated with standard pediatric epilepsy monitoring, this study provides a foundation for the needs-based development and implementation of supplementary contactless sensor technologies. Such technologies should be tailored to the clinical setting and designed to address existing burdens, with the potential to complement standard monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.