ArticleHormone research in paediatrics2026
Social Determinants of Health Impact on Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Outcomes Early after Diagnosis.
Article in Hormone research in paediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDisparities in diabetes technology use and glycemic outcomes among US youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are strongly associated with race/ethnicity and insurance. The Social Deprivation Index (SDI) offers a multidimensional measure of area-level socioeconomic disadvantage linked to poorer health outcomes in pediatric populations.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,541 youth aged <19 years who were newly diagnosed with T1D between 2018 and 2022 at a single tertiary care center. SDI was calculated from address and categorized into quintiles (Q1 least deprived). Primary outcomes included time to continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and insulin pump initiation and hemoglobin A1c (A1c) over 12 months. Differences by SDI quintile were assessed using interval-censored Cox proportional hazards and linear mixed-effects models.
resultsWithin 1 year, 84% initiated CGM and 50% initiated pump therapy. Time to CGM initiation increased across SDI quintiles; patients in Q3-Q5 were significantly less likely to initiate CGM than Q1 (Q3: HR, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.66-0.99, p = 0.036; Q4: 0.81, 0.67-0.98, p = 0.027; Q5: 0.69, 0.56-0.86; p = 0.001). Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, and Medicaid-insured patients had lower CGM uptake. Pump initiation was significantly lower only in Q5. Among CGM users, Q5 had higher A1c than Q1 (difference 0.80%, p = 0.001). Among non-pump users, Q4 and Q5 had higher A1c than Q1. AID users had lower A1c than pump-only users (7.0% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.003).
conclusionA1c is lower across all SDI levels with CGM use, but disparities persist. Addressing structural barriers is essential to achieving equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.