Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41875276›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Longitudinal and Multimodal Recording System to Capture Real-World Patient-Clinician Conversations for AI and Encounter Research: Protocol for an Observational Study.

Misk Al Zahidy, Kerly Guevara Maldonado, Luis Vilatuna Andrango, Ana Cristina Proano, Ana Gabriela Claros, Maria Lizarazo Jimenez, Esteban Gomez-Alvarez, David Toro-Tobon, Victor M Montori, Oscar J Ponce-Ponte and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Misk Al ZahidyCare and AI Laboratory, Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-1999-9351
Kerly Guevara MaldonadoCare and AI Laboratory, Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1881-3571
Luis Vilatuna AndrangoCare and AI Laboratory, Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5153-0904
Ana Cristina ProanoCare and AI Laboratory, Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-2373-7116
Ana Gabriela ClarosCare and AI Laboratory, Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-3632-523X
Maria Lizarazo JimenezCare and AI Laboratory, Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2111-4440
Esteban Gomez-AlvarezCare and AI Laboratory, Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-2349-850X
David Toro-TobonCare and AI Laboratory, Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1910-4144
Victor M MontoriCare and AI Laboratory, Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-2898
Oscar J Ponce-PonteCare and AI Laboratory, Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5729-8408
Juan P BritoCare and AI Laboratory, Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1840-1745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The promise of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine depends on its ability to learn from data that reflect what matters to patients and clinicians in the care process. Most existing models are trained on electronic health records (EHRs), which primarily capture biological measures but rarely the interactions and relationships between patients and clinicians. These relationships, central to how care is understood, negotiated, and delivered, unfold across multiple modalities, including voice, text, and video, yet remain largely absent from current datasets. As a result, AI systems trained solely on EHRs risk perpetuating a narrow biomedical view of medicine and overlooking the lived exchanges that define clinical encounters. Objective: This study aims to design, implement, and evaluate the feasibility of a longitudinal, multimodal system for capturing patient-clinician encounters, linking 360° video or audio recordings with postvisit surveys and EHR data, to create a foundational dataset for downstream AI research. Methods: This single-site study was conducted in an academic outpatient specialty clinic (Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States). Adult patients attending in-person visits with participating clinicians were invited to enroll. Encounters were recorded using a 360° 2D monocular video camera and dual-channel audio. After each visit, patients completed a brief survey assessing relational empathy, satisfaction, visit pace, and treatment burden. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the EHR. Feasibility was assessed using 5 prespecified end points: clinician consent, patient consent, recording success, survey completion, and data linkage across modalities. Results: Recruitment began in January 2025. By August 2025, 35 of 36 (97%) eligible clinicians and 212 of 281 (75%) approached eligible patients had consented. Of the consented encounters, 162 (76%) resulted in a complete 360° video recording, and the postvisit surveys were completed for 204 of 212 (96%) consented encounters, reflecting 1 survey per encounter. Data collection is ongoing as of December 2025, and further analyses will be reported in subsequent publications. Conclusions: This protocol describes a longitudinal multimodal encounter capture system that links 360° audio or video with postvisit surveys and EHR data. The study specifies operational definitions, workflows, feasibility end points, and governance procedures to support implementation and replication in other clinical settings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultElectronic Health RecordsFeasibility StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesObservational Studies as TopicVideo RecordingAIartificial intelligencedigital healthelectronic health recordsendocrinologyfeasibility studiesmultimodal data capturepatient-clinician communication

Identifiers

PMID41875276
PMCPMC13012220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.