Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41875211›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

Design considerations for technology-assisted fall-resisting skills training trials in older adults: A pilot and feasibility study.

Elisabeth G van der Hulst, Kenneth Meijer, Pieter Meyns, Christopher McCrum

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elisabeth G van der HulstDepartment of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8403-0714
Kenneth MeijerDepartment of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8236-8754
Pieter MeynsREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2218-187X
Christopher McCrumDepartment of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4927-1114

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training fall-resisting skills can prevent falls in older adults. These fall-resisting skills include proactive gait adaptability, gait robustness, and reactive gait recovery, which allow people to effectively avoid, resist, and recover from balance threats, respectively. This pilot study guided the design of an RCT of fall-resisting skills training by investigating key design factors, such as the design of a placebo-control group, obstacle difficulty settings, exploring evaluation methods for gait robustness, testing the effect of task unpredictability on anxiety, and the general feasibility. Eleven healthy older adults performed non-task-specific "placebo" balance tasks and assessment and training tasks for each fall-resisting skill. Placebo tasks included static weight-shifting exercises and dual-task walking. For the fall-resisting skill tasks, participants walked on a treadmill under different conditions. For proactive gait adaptability, participants avoided projected obstacles varying in size, approach speed, and available response time. Gait robustness was assessed using perturbations of increasing magnitude, where the margin of stability following each perturbation was compared with participants' perceived balance loss and researchers' observations. For reactive gait recovery, perturbations with increasing unpredictability were applied, after which participants reported their anxiety scores. Weight-shifting tasks were perceived as balance training by most participants, indicating their potential as placebo tasks. Obstacle avoidance difficulty increased most with fast approach speed and large obstacle sizes. A margin of stability-based threshold did not consistently align with perceived balance loss or observer judgement. Anxiety did not increase with more unpredictable perturbation tasks when introduced gradually. Fall-resisting skill tasks generally were feasible for older adults.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsPostural BalanceAgedDual-Task TestsFeasibility StudiesFemaleGaitHumansMalePilot ProjectsWalking

Identifiers

PMID41875211
PMCPMC13012456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.