Trial reportPloS one2026
Design considerations for technology-assisted fall-resisting skills training trials in older adults: A pilot and feasibility study.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Training fall-resisting skills can prevent falls in older adults. These fall-resisting skills include proactive gait adaptability, gait robustness, and reactive gait recovery, which allow people to effectively avoid, resist, and recover from balance threats, respectively. This pilot study guided the design of an RCT of fall-resisting skills training by investigating key design factors, such as the design of a placebo-control group, obstacle difficulty settings, exploring evaluation methods for gait robustness, testing the effect of task unpredictability on anxiety, and the general feasibility. Eleven healthy older adults performed non-task-specific "placebo" balance tasks and assessment and training tasks for each fall-resisting skill. Placebo tasks included static weight-shifting exercises and dual-task walking. For the fall-resisting skill tasks, participants walked on a treadmill under different conditions. For proactive gait adaptability, participants avoided projected obstacles varying in size, approach speed, and available response time. Gait robustness was assessed using perturbations of increasing magnitude, where the margin of stability following each perturbation was compared with participants' perceived balance loss and researchers' observations. For reactive gait recovery, perturbations with increasing unpredictability were applied, after which participants reported their anxiety scores. Weight-shifting tasks were perceived as balance training by most participants, indicating their potential as placebo tasks. Obstacle avoidance difficulty increased most with fast approach speed and large obstacle sizes. A margin of stability-based threshold did not consistently align with perceived balance loss or observer judgement. Anxiety did not increase with more unpredictable perturbation tasks when introduced gradually. Fall-resisting skill tasks generally were feasible for older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.