ArticlePloS one2026
'Fend for yourself': Nurses' experiences transitioning to Family Care Team practice settings in Newfoundland and Labrador.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamily Care Teams were introduced in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) as a strategy to strengthen primary care through team-based models that optimize interprofessional collaboration. Nurses, including nurse practitioners (NPs), registered nurses (RNs), and licensed practical nurses (LPNs), play critical roles in these models; however, little is known about nurses' transition to these settings or the supports shaping their integration and effectiveness. To address this gap, we explored nurses' experiences transitioning into Family Care Teams, including supports for integration and the barriers and facilitators influencing this process.
methodsAs part of a qualitative descriptive study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 nurses (6 NPs, 13 RNs, 6 LPNs) employed in Family Care Teams across five NL health zones. During the interviews, nurses described their experiences working in Family Care Teams, available practice supports, current roles, and barriers and facilitators to maximizing scope of practice. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis and constant comparison.
resultsParticipants described their transition to Family Care Teams in two stages: 1) orientation and 2) supportive learning relationships. Orientation was highly variable, ranging in length and structure. Learning in this area was often self-directed, technology-focused, and asynchronous, with limited emphasis on clinical preparation or role expectations. Mentorship and shadowing opportunities were inconsistently available, with many nurses lacking access to experienced role models within the newly established teams. These gaps contributed to role ambiguity, underutilization of nursing scope of practice, and prolonged adjustment periods.
conclusionsOur findings reveal gaps in orientation and mentorship during nurses' transition into Family Care Teams in NL. A common yet adaptable transition framework, expanded student placements, and structured mentorship are critical to optimizing nursing roles in team-based care. Strengthening practice supports and clarifying nursing contributions can improve access and care quality while informing broader initiatives to support nurses' transition into primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.