ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Do men face greater barriers to accessing HIV testing services than women? Might HIV self-testing be the answer? Evidence from a longitudinal survey in east Zimbabwe (2018-2023).
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HIV testing is crucial for prevention and treatment, yet barriers may disproportionately affect men in some sub-Saharan African settings. HIV self-testing (HIVST) may offer a promising solution, but its uptake remains under-explored. This study examines sex-specific barriers, HIV testing trends, and HIVST uptake in Manicaland, Zimbabwe, across three survey rounds pre-, during-, and post-COVID-19. We conducted longitudinal surveys 2018-2019 (pre- COVID-19), 2021 (during COVID-19), 2022-2023 (post-COVID-19), across six socio-economic zones (tea estates, rural villages, forestry areas, towns, roadside settlements, and urban areas) in eastern Zimbabwe. The study employed an open cohort design with repeated cross-sections, complemented by a sub-analysis among repeat participants to assess robustness. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, HIV testing, perceived barriers, and HIVST awareness and usage were analysed using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Men consistently had lower odds of HIV testing than women (2022-2023, aOR=0.74, 95% CI:0.67-0.81, P < 0.001). Barriers to HIV testing peaked during COVID-19 (2021), with men reporting three to five times higher barriers than women, including "judgmental staff" (24.5% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.005) and "lack of privacy" (21.5% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.032). Rural residents had reduced testing odds post-COVID-19 (aOR=0.82, 95% CI:0.69-0.99, P = 0.034). Although HIVST awareness increased, particularly among men compared to women, (66.7% vs 58.5%, aOR=2.21, 95% CI:2.09-2.33, P < 0.001), usage remained low (5.9%, vs 9.8%). Men report substantially greater barriers to HIV testing in Zimbabwe, exacerbated during the COVID-19 and are now further threatened by cuts to HIV funding. Although HIVST awareness expanded, its low uptake among men highlights the need for improved linkage-to-care mechanisms and tailored outreach such as peer-led distribution models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.