ArticlePloS one2026
Seasonal variation in meat quality of Angus steers raised in a Mediterranean forage-fed system: A farm case study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study monitored the impact of seasonal feeding variability on meat quality traits in forage-fed Angus steers. A total of 38 steers were selected based on their diets during the last three months before slaughter: a hay-based winter diet (WIN), a spring fresh-forage-based diet (SPR), or a summer fresh-forage-based diet (SMM). Meat quality was assessed through fatty acid profiling, antioxidant capacity, myoglobin content, color stability, and lipid oxidation during refrigerated storage. Principal components and linear discriminant analysis were used to uncover, underlying patterns, and classify the observations based on the multivariate profile. Meat fatty acids showed limited variation across seasons, with differences restricted to minor polyunsaturated fatty acids. The n-6/n-3 ratio and other health-related lipid indices remained within recommended values despite the feeding season. Meat from SPR and SMM animals showed higher α- and γ-tocopherol levels and greater myoglobin content compared to WIN meat. Color parameters and lipid oxidation were moderately affected by diet and storage time, with better stability observed in meat from animals receiving fresh forage. Despite the subtle impact on individual quality traits, multivariate discriminant analysis effectively differentiated meat samples based on the feeding season, achieving 89.5% correct classification. The most discriminating variables included fatty acids (17:1 c9, 18:1 t10, 22:0, 22:5 n-6), color attributes (b*), and oxidative markers (TBARS, metmyoglobin %). With the caution due to the nature of the study, these findings suggest that while single quality indicators may not strongly reflect dietary differences, their combination may provide a tool to trace seasonal feeding strategies in grass-fed beef production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.