ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
Validating COI eDNA Metabarcoding Primers for Detection of Subterranean Fauna.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subterranean ecosystems host a diverse range of ancient fauna, but studying these ecosystems is challenging due to significant sampling difficulties. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding offers a promising approach for monitoring subterranean biodiversity, yet issues such as primer bias and non-target amplification can complicate its effectiveness. Thus, thorough validation of metabarcoding primers is crucial for accurate and comprehensive assessments of subterranean faunal diversity. This study aimed to address the need for robust primer validation through in silico, in vitro and in situ analyses, shedding light on primer performance across various subterranean taxa. The primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of COI metabarcoding primers for assessing subterranean faunal diversity. In silico analyses involved curating COI sequences from the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) and selecting 14 primer combinations for in vitro testing using mock communities. Results revealed varying primer performance in terms of PCR efficiency and detection limits across different taxa. One primer combination (BF1/jgHCO2198) detected 82% of taxa in the mock community, but only at high DNA concentrations of the target taxa. The highest proportion of subterranean taxa detected in a diluted mock community was 68% using the fwhF2/fwhR2n primer combination. For in situ field validation, this same primer set detected 13 out of 16 subterranean taxa identified in haul net samples, along with an additional four taxa not identified by haul net. These findings highlight the potential of COI metabarcoding and the critical importance of primer selection for eDNA studies aimed at conserving subterranean biodiversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.