ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2026
Human stem cell-based embryo models: innovation, ethics, and policy.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Balancing flexibility and ethical oversight: Japan's regulatory framework for human stem cell-based embryo model research.Stem cell reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this White Paper is to establish a foundational framework for research, technological development, and regulation in the emerging field of stem cell-based embryo models (SCBEMs). These models, generated from Pluripotent Stem Cells, are designed to recapitulate essential events in early stages of human development. They have the potential to illuminate the early stages of embryo development and implantation and hold promise as an avenue to address global health challenges, including infertility and pregnancy loss, congenital, neonatal and adult conditions, and the need for organ transplants. While SCBEMs are not a substitute for human embryos, their tractability for large-scale analysis and their abilities to model the earliest stages of embryonic development suggest that they will have a significant impact on reproductive biology and regenerative medicine. But SCBEMs do not just raise novel scientific questions; they pose ethical and legal questions that need to be addressed. The paper stems from a meeting of a core group of researchers that met at the Institut Pasteur in Paris in November 2024 and represents the views of an extended group that has worked to elaborate the documents as a consensus for the field. Here, we provide a framework to guide research in this new field. We do this by summarizing the state of the science, assessing current SCBEM research in relation to its primary future applications and addressing the need for continued ethical and regulatory oversight associated with this new field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.