Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41875039›Full record

ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2026

Denoising framework for X-ray absorption spectroscopy data.

Tomas Aidukas, Ilnura Usmanova, Benjamín Béjar Haro, Maarten Nachtegaal, Adam H Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tomas AidukasCenter for Photon Science, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7280-7693
Ilnura UsmanovaSwiss Data Science Center, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Benjamín Béjar HaroSwiss Data Science Center, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Maarten NachtegaalCenter for Photon Science, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1895-9626
Adam H ClarkCenter for Photon Science, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5478-9639

Funding

Swiss Data Science Center (SDSC) C22-13L
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) is a powerful tool for probing the structural and electronic properties of materials, but its analysis is often challenging due to the low signal-to-noise ratio of the XAS spectra. Denoising of XAS spectra is particularly challenging because the measured spectral features span a broad range of feature widths. Such spectral feature variability is called non-stationarity. XAS spectra also suffer from energy-dependent noise and are often acquired using non-uniform energy sampling. While a broad range of denoising methods exists, they underperform when dealing with non-stationary and non-uniformly sampled signals. We introduce a novel stationarity warping approach, which transforms XAS spectra into a domain where they appear stationary, resulting in greatly improved denoising performance. This warping approach can be combined with any denoising method. We also implemented advanced denoisers based on Gaussian process regression and a convolutional autoencoder. All of the denoising and stationarity warping methods are packaged into a Python-based denoising software called XASDenoise, which provides a modular, easy-to-use denoising functionality of XAS measurements. Our benchmarking shows that stationarity warping consistently enhances spectral feature preservation and noise suppression across a diverse range of XAS datasets and is applicable to any denoising method.

Indexed as

autoencoderdenoisingGaussian processXASX-ray absorption spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID41875039
PMCPMC13148605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.