Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41875027›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Integrated Implementation Strategies to Promote the Use of AI-Assisted Diagnostic Software for Lung Nodule Screening in China: Process Evaluation Based on the RE-AIM Framework.

Xiwen Liao, Yifan Tian, Yaning Cheng, Xiaomeng Sun, Yingxin Zhang, Yan Tang, Zhe Zhao, Yuanyuan Lun, Shentang Wang, Yan Li and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Xiwen LiaoDepartment of Medical Statistics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2349-8775
Yifan TianRehabilitation Information Research Department, China Rehabilitation Science Institute, No. 18 Jiaomen North Road, Beijing, 100068, China, 86 010-67563322.ORCID 0009-0009-2440-4812
Yaning ChengRehabilitation Information Research Department, China Rehabilitation Science Institute, No. 18 Jiaomen North Road, Beijing, 100068, China, 86 010-67563322.ORCID 0009-0003-5746-7859
Xiaomeng SunRehabilitation Information Research Department, China Rehabilitation Science Institute, No. 18 Jiaomen North Road, Beijing, 100068, China, 86 010-67563322.ORCID 0009-0009-7127-8820
Yingxin ZhangRehabilitation Information Research Department, China Rehabilitation Science Institute, No. 18 Jiaomen North Road, Beijing, 100068, China, 86 010-67563322.ORCID 0009-0002-8508-8111
Yan TangTieying Hospital, Fengtai Rehabilitation Hospital of Beijing Municipality, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0007-8430-0850
Zhe ZhaoTieying Hospital, Fengtai Rehabilitation Hospital of Beijing Municipality, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0002-8385-2286
Yuanyuan LunTieying Hospital, Fengtai Rehabilitation Hospital of Beijing Municipality, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0007-5498-9263
Shentang WangTieying Hospital, Fengtai Rehabilitation Hospital of Beijing Municipality, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0004-6145-4046
Yan LiTieying Hospital, Fengtai Rehabilitation Hospital of Beijing Municipality, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0004-2616-7156
Yingzhe FuTieying Hospital, Fengtai Rehabilitation Hospital of Beijing Municipality, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0007-4533-0248
Danrui ZongTieying Hospital, Fengtai Rehabilitation Hospital of Beijing Municipality, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0003-0177-7671
Ling ChenBeijing Boai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0007-7549-2598
Qimin WangBeijing Boai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0001-7619-3131
Hongxia ZhangBeijing Boai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1359-7921
Chen Yao *Department of Medical Statistics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4224-5535
Di Chen *Rehabilitation Information Research Department, China Rehabilitation Science Institute, No. 18 Jiaomen North Road, Beijing, 100068, China, 86 010-67563322.ORCID 0009-0001-6014-102X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnostic software holds promise for improving diagnostic efficiency and reducing disparities in health care delivery, its effective implementation in lower-tier health care settings remains limited in China. Most existing studies have focused on algorithm performance, while real-world implementation strategies remain underexplored, particularly in resource-constrained clinical environments. Objective: This study aimed to design, implement, and evaluate an integrated, context-specific strategy to facilitate the effective implementation of AI-assisted diagnostic software for pulmonary nodule screening in a secondary hospital within China's hierarchical health care system. Methods: A prospective process evaluation was conducted in a secondary hospital in Beijing, supported by a collaborating tertiary referral center. The implementation strategy integrated AI software for computed tomography-based pulmonary nodule analysis into the diagnostic workflow of the secondary hospital, enabling initial screening and identification of suspected cases. Patients meeting referral criteria were referred to the tertiary hospital through a structured mechanism facilitated by a cloud-based data transfer tool, which enabled the return of diagnostic feedback and ensured continuity through a bidirectional referral and feedback system. Short-term implementation outcomes were evaluated using the RE-AIM framework, focusing on feasibility, adoption, and areas for improvement. Results: During the study period, 85.6% (1105/1291) of chest computed tomography scans were analyzed using the AI software, with a significant increase in the pulmonary nodule detection rate compared to the historical control group (65.2% vs 32.4%, P<.001). Among eligible patients, 88% (22/25) completed referral to the tertiary hospital, indicating a high level of adherence to the referral protocol. Moreover, 90.9% (20/22) of imaging data were transmitted successfully via the data transfer tool, facilitating timely diagnosis. However, several challenges remained, including the low rate of fully documented referral records (28%) and minimal use of diagnostic feedback by referring physicians. These limitations were largely attributed to disruptions in routine clinical workflows due to inadequate integration of the data transfer tool with existing hospital systems and continued reliance on manual data entry. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility and potential value of deploying AI-assisted diagnostic software in a secondary hospital when supported by a tailored referral mechanism and interhospital data exchange systems. The findings highlighted the critical role of referral adherence, information infrastructure, and feedback mechanisms in optimizing the clinical utility of AI technologies. Further multicenter research is warranted to assess the generalizability, cost-effectiveness, long-term sustainability, and scalability of the implementation strategies across diverse health care settings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningSoftwareSolitary Pulmonary NoduleChinaHumansIntelligent SystemsProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computedartificial intelligencediagnostic supporthierarchical medical systemimplementation strategiesRE-AIM

Identifiers

PMID41875027
PMCPMC13011999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.