Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41875025›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biomedical data science2026

Privacy and Security Throughout the Health Data Life Cycle: From Primary Care to Research Networks.

Bradley A Malin, Chao Yan, Luca Bonomi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biomedical data science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bradley A MalinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; email: b.malin@vumc.org.
Chao YanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; email: b.malin@vumc.org.
Luca BonomiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; email: b.malin@vumc.org.

Funding

Ethics Core (FABRIC)U54HG012510 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MALIN, BRADLEY A. · 2022 to 2025
$11.2M
Decentralized differentially-private methods for dynamic data release and analysisR01LM013712 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
Creating, evaluating, and sharing synthetic data for multinational HIV cohortsR01MH139379 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Bradley A. Malin, Bryan Earl Shepherd · 2025 to 2026
$1.6M
SAFEGENOMES: Strong privacy Assurance For Effective GENOME SharingR00HG010493 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BONOMI, LUCA · 2022 to 2024
$744k
Generative AI for synthetic data: A framework to expand health data reach for research and ensure algorithmic fairnessK99LM014428 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI YAN, CHAO · 2024 to 2025
$174k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG010493NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG012510NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH139379NLM NIH HHS K99 LM014428NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health data are increasingly generated, shared, and analyzed across an ever-growing collection of settings. While these developments enable new forms of biomedical discovery and clinical decision support, they also introduce evolving privacy, security, and trust challenges that extend beyond traditional regulatory and technical frameworks. In this review, we characterize the various risks and protections throughout the health data life cycle, from data generation and primary use in healthcare to secondary use in research and artificial intelligence (AI) model development. We discuss how regulation, organizational practices, and technological choices shape data protection requirements, and we discuss and contextualize emerging threats, such as incidental disclosures through AI tools. We further review technical approaches for mitigating these risks, including access control and auditing, re-identification risk assessment and statistical mechanisms for risk mitigation (e.g., differential privacy), and synthetic data generation. We also consider how collaboration across disparate organizations may be achieved through federated learning mechanisms and cryptographic technologies, such as secure multiparty computation. Throughout, we highlight trade-offs between privacy protection and data utility, and we articulate practical challenges in deploying these methods at scale. We conclude by identifying open issues for the field, including the need for standardized metrics and greater transparency to support trust in data-driven healthcare and research.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityConfidentialityPrimary Health CarePrivacyArtificial IntelligenceFederated LearningHumansartificial intelligencehealth dataprivacysecurity

Identifiers

PMID41875025
PMCPMC13637442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.