ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2026
Head Motion Correction Based on Pilot Tone Signals in MRI: A Referenceless Method.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motion remains a problem in clinical MRI, largely because all existing effective correction methods tend to come with constraints on pulse sequence parameters, expensive/bulky equipment, or extra steps in the workflow. The Pilot Tone (PT) is a small device that does not physically contact with the patient and only minimally impacts workflows. However, its signals can be difficult to process due to drifts, noise, and because they are difficult to model. We developed a motion correction algorithm that exploits the information from PT signals and tested the algorithm in 20 human subjects: four healthy volunteers and 16 patients. The study focused on a popular pulse sequence called 'magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo' (MPRAGE). A total of 156 MPRAGE scans were evaluated with quantitative and qualitative metrics. Images corrupted by artifacts were meaningfully improved by the proposed method, as demonstrated through increases in 'structural similarity index measure' (SSIM) and 'Dice similarity coefficient' (DSC) scores relative to ground truth scans and higher qualitative scores for motion corrected images compared to uncorrected images from three expert readers. Equally important, motion-free images were largely unaffected by the approach, as demonstrated through the expert reading scores and side-by-side image comparisons. The fact that the PT device requires no physical contact with the patient, coupled with the quantitative and qualitative effectiveness and relatively short reconstruction time (about 70 seconds per MPRAGE dataset), suggests that the approach could potentially succeed in transitioning to clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.