Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41874932›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Botho: A cultural framework for resilient human-wildlife coexistence in Botswana.

Otshabile Bahetoleng, Amanda Stronza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Otshabile BahetolengDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University - Sterling C. Evans Library & Annex, 2258 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-2258, USA. botshabile@tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6375-6457
Amanda StronzaDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University - Sterling C. Evans Library & Annex, 2258 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-2258, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8426-2854

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2021-70001-34519National Science Foundation 2518985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botho is a foundational philosophy in Sub-Saharan Africa that emphasizes interdependence, respect, and shared humanity. While it has traditionally shaped human-wildlife relationships, its present contribution to coexistence with large carnivores remains underexplored. This paper examines how Botho is a part of local decision-making in cattle farming communities of the Kalahari region of Botswana and how it shapes their choices in tolerating and coexisting with lions. Drawing on ethnographic field research, the paper describes how conservationists and cattle farmers practice Botho, and how and why it can be positive for wildlife and coexistence. The expression of Botho between social actors eases tensions, including human-human conflict over wildlife. When people treat each other with Botho, they develop empathy for one another, which sometimes extends to the wildlife. This is a potent if indirect way Botho can be a path to coexistence.

Indexed as

Animals, WildConservation of Natural ResourcesLionsAnimalsBotswanaCattleHumansBothoCarnivoresCoexistenceRelational valuesUbuntu

Identifiers

PMID41874932
PMCPMC13035972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.