ReviewSports medicine - open2026
Influence of Hip Abductor Strength on Running Biomechanics in Healthy Populations: A Scoping Review.
Review in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current evidence provides both rationale and preliminary support for an association between hip abductor weakness and detrimental running biomechanics. Previous reviews suggest a potential, but inconsistent, role of hip abductor strength in controlling lower limb biomechanics, with conclusions varying depending on the methodology, population, and task. This scoping review aimed to identify and map all available evidence about the influence of hip abductor strength on running biomechanics in healthy runners comparing study designs and methods. Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus) were systematically screened for peer-reviewed articles in English investigating the influence of hip abductor strength on running biomechanics in healthy runners. Running biomechanics were defined as any quantitative kinematic (e.g., joint angles) or kinetic (e.g., joint moments) outcome. Eligible studies were synthesized and presented in a summary table, including general and experimental study characteristics and outcome results. After removing duplicate entries, 1322 records were identified, and 19 articles found to be eligible. These studies examined a wide range of gait cycle characteristics across a diverse set of biomechanical variables. Most studies focused on the hip (n = 16) followed by the knee (n = 8), and pelvis (n = 7). Fewer studies examined the trunk (n = 3), followed by the ankle (n = 2), and tibia (n = 1). Frequently reported outcomes included peak angles, range of motion, angular excursion, and peak velocity. Study designs and methodologies varied considerably. Most studies were cross-sectional (n = 17), while only two were intervention trials, both with notable methodological limitations. Overall, the evidence provides insufficient support for a consistent association between hip abductor or external rotator strength and running biomechanics in healthy runners, and no convincing evidence that strengthening these muscles alone leads to systematic or predictable changes in running kinematics or kinetics. These findings challenge commonly held assumptions regarding the biomechanical effects of hip strengthening and highlight the need for well-controlled intervention studies with greater methodological consistency. Future research should prioritize experimental designs that test hip strengthening under specific conditions, such as fatigue or higher running speeds, to determine whether meaningful biomechanical effects occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.