Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41874837›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2026

US Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies with Elements to Assure Safe Use: A Longitudinal Analysis of REMS Modifications (2008-2022).

Elaine H Morrato, Elizabeth J Campagna, Cynthia LaCivita, Gita A Toyserkani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elaine H MorratoParkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 South First Avenue, Building 120, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA. EMorrato@luc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6105-7826
Elizabeth J CampagnaIndependent Statistical Consultant, Denver, CO, USA.
Cynthia LaCivitaCLL Consulting, LLC, Potomac, MD, USA.
Gita A ToyserkaniPerspective Pharmacovigilance, Inc., Walnut Creek, CA, USA.

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
NCATS NIH HHS 2UL1TR002389NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535U.S. Food and Drug Administration Intergovernmental Personal Act (IPA) Contract
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRisk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) are risk management healthcare interventions required by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for certain prescription medicines with serious safety concerns to protect public health and ensure that the benefits outweigh its risks. REMS are expected to evolve over a drug's lifecycle on the basis of new pharmacovigilance evidence and changing healthcare delivery context.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to characterize the frequency and types of REMS modifications over time to inform health policy and pharmacovigilance practice.

methodsA retrospective longitudinal case series study was conducted using publicly available data on program characteristics and change history from the FDA's public website (REMS@FDA). All REMS programs with elements to assure safe use (ETASU; N = 100) approved by the FDA between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2022 were linked longitudinally into "REMS Classes" based on common drug class and/or moiety (N = 67). Median follow-up per program was 7.4 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.3-11.6) years after the index REMS approval. Type of REMS modification was coded and categorized as major or minor using the FDA's guidance to the industry. Frequency and type of modification and time to first major modification were assessed.

resultsThe median number of new REMS Classes approved per year was four. In the last 5 years of observation (2017-2022), REMS were being exclusively introduced concurrently with product approval. The median number of modifications per year per REMS class was 1.2 (IQR 0.7-1.6), representing 671 modifications and 364 unique dates. The median time to first modification was 15.4 (IQR 6.9-25.8) months and did not vary by when the index REMS was approved. Of the REMS classes, 96% (n = 64) had at least one modification by end of observation. As the cumulative number of REMS classes increased over time, modifications to approved REMS classes outpaced the approval of new REMS classes 17:1. The most common types of modifications were changes to REMS goals and/or design (n = 221) and changes to REMS materials (n = 167). However, no clear patterns were observed to suggest a specific type of early modification was more common than another. Among the 32 REMS classes approved in the first 5 years following the FDA Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA; 2008-2012), approximately one half (n = 14) had evolved to a shared system REMS by end of observation and one third (n = 10) had been released (median time to release 7.0 years, IQR 4.7-7.2 years).

conclusionsREMS modifications were common and demonstrated responsiveness to new evidence about the drug and adaptation to changing patterns of healthcare delivery within a learning health system.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilanceRisk Evaluation and MitigationRisk ManagementHumansLongitudinal StudiesRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID41874837
PMCPMC13263192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.