ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a contemporary head-to-head comparison.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transaxillar Impella Implantation: Learning Curve Analysis and the Role of Mentorship in Accelerating Proficiency.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern technology has expanded the armamentarium of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices implemented for hemodynamic stabilization of patients in cardiogenic shock. The predominately used ones are intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella devices, and extracorporeal life support (ECLS) circuits. They are transcutaneous or surgically implanted, utilized for up to 30 days and can either assist or totally replace cardiac function, providing time for myocardial healing (bridge to recovery) or treatment escalation (bridge to destination therapy, bridge to transplantation). In light of the recently published joint consensus of the Perioperative Quality Initiative and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Cardiac Society on temporary mechanical circulatory support, purpose of the current review is to provide a succinct head-to-head comparison of widely available devices, as well as current escalation, de-escalation and antithrombotic protocols; thus, it proposes immediately translatable device selection and operation algorithms to medical professionals for optimal patient care and effective management of cardiogenic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.