Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41874805›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Effect of increasing prickly pear cactus (Nopalea cochenillifera) levels in diets of Holstein × Zebu dairy cows on nutrients intake and digestibility, ingestive behavior, and milk fatty acids profile.

Fernando Rossa, Adriane Pereira da Silva Dos Santos, Fábio Andrade Teixeira, Claudenor de Jesus Santos, Robério Rodrigues Silva, José Esler de Freitas Júnior, Lara Maria Santos Brant, Fabiano Ferreira da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fernando RossaDepartment of Ruminant Production, State University of Southwestern Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45.700-000, Brazil.
Adriane Pereira da Silva Dos SantosDepartment of Ruminant Production, State University of Southwestern Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45.700-000, Brazil.
Fábio Andrade TeixeiraDepartment of Ruminant Production, State University of Southwestern Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45.700-000, Brazil.
Claudenor de Jesus SantosDepartment of Ruminant Production, State University of Southwestern Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45.700-000, Brazil.
Robério Rodrigues SilvaDepartment of Ruminant Production, State University of Southwestern Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45.700-000, Brazil.
José Esler de Freitas JúniorDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, 40.170-110, Brazil. jose.esler@ufba.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1559-0149
Lara Maria Santos BrantDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, 40.170-110, Brazil.
Fabiano Ferreira da SilvaDepartment of Ruminant Production, State University of Southwestern Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45.700-000, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of including different levels of prickly pear cactus (Nopalea cochenillifera) in the diets of crossbred dairy cows (Holstein × Zebu) on nutrient intake and digestibility, nitrogen balance, microbial protein synthesis, milk yield and composition, and feeding behavior. Eight multiparous cows (15.9 ± 1.8 kg/day of milk; 100 ± 11 days in milk, mean ± SD) were assigned to a double 4 × 4 Latin square design with 21-day periods, consisting of 16 days of dietary adaptation followed by 5 days of data collection. The experimental diets were: (1) CON, without prickly pear cactus (PPC); (2) PPC16, containing 16% PPC in dry matter (DM); (3) PPC32, with 32% PPC in DM; and (4) PPC48, with 48% PPC in DM. The inclusion of PPC reduced NDF intake, both in absolute terms (P = 0.037) and relative to body weight (P = 0.021), and decreased water intake compared with the control diet (P < 0.001), showing a quadratic response to inclusion levels (P < 0.001). For digestibility, quadratic effects were observed for crude protein (P = 0.007) and ether extract (P < 0.001). Milk yield and principal components (protein, fat, and lactose) were not affected (P > 0.05). However, PPC reduced milk cholesterol concentration (P = 0.013) and altered the fatty acid profile, specifically decreasing CLA c9t11 (P = 0.025) and n-3 fatty acids (P = 0.033), while also increasing the proportion of saturated fatty acids (P = 0.027). It was concluded that intermediate levels of prickly pear cactus inclusion (32–35% of DM) optimized nutrient utilization while maintaining milk production, representing the most suitable supplementation strategy for crossbred dairy cows under tropical conditions.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDigestionMilkOpuntiaAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCattleDietEatingFatty AcidsFeeding BehaviorFemaleFatty AcidsAlternative forageCactaceaMilk productionWater use efficiency

Identifiers

PMID41874805
PMCPMC13013259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.