ArticleGeroScience2026
Revisiting the social frailty index in aging adults: relevance and implications for an emerging construct.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frailty is an established benchmark of aging-related decline, yet most measures of frailty focus on physical decline. Increasing evidence that social environments influence trajectories of aging has led to growing interest in social frailty. Recently, a 10-item Social Frailty Index (SFI-10) was developed using data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) that used 8 social items plus chronological age and sex to predict mortality. This study evaluates the validity of the SFI-10, providing considerations for social frailty measurement. Utilizing HRS cohorts (n = 8264, ages 66 to 101) and cohorts from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study (n = 5619, ages 40 to 75), the SFI-10 was evaluated alongside an index including only its social-environmental factors (SFI-8). Logistic regressions were used to predict mortality from the SFI-10, SFI-8, and only age and sex. Within MIDUS, the SFI-10, SFI-8, and age were further evaluated against external criteria relevant for social frailty. Findings indicate that chronological age is the most important predictor of mortality risk across both samples. Social-environmental factors predict mortality only marginally in older adults but more strongly in midlife. When associated with external criteria relevant for social frailty, the SFI-8 exhibited stronger criterion validity than the SFI-10. These findings suggest that social frailty may be best reflected by measures focusing exclusively on social behaviors and resources, excluding demographic characteristics. Our work underscores the need for well-designed measures of social frailty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41874767What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.