ArticleOecologia2026
Fire and edge disturbances in the Amazon rainforest: impacts on animal-fruit and seed interactions.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Burned forests-particularly at their edges-are expected to lose capacity for regeneration, and subsequent disturbances may further limit it. Animal-plant interactions are critical to the resilience of tropical forests to disturbances, as they sustain key ecological functions. However, climate and land-use changes are intensifying fire regimes, potentially disrupting these interactions. Using experimental approaches with artificial fruits (in the understory and on the terrestrial level) and agricultural crop seeds (accessed by all fauna and invertebrates-only), we investigated how animal-plant interactions, focusing on key faunal groups, are affected in disturbed forests 12 years after repeated experimental fires and under continuous edge effects in the southeastern Brazilian Amazon. We found that understory animal-fruit interactions were similar across burned, edge, and undisturbed forests, whereas terrestrial animal-fruit interactions were twice as high at the unburned edge. While vertebrates accessed understory fruits more frequently, invertebrates dominated terrestrial interactions, highlighting their complementary roles. In contrast, seed interactions by both the broader faunal community and invertebrates-only declined in the interior and edge of burned forests, while invertebrate-driven seed interactions were similar between unburned edge and burned forest interior. Our findings show contrasting responses to indirect fire and edge effects across ecological interactions that support forest regeneration. Therefore, we underscore the fragility of ecological interactions through faunal access to reproductive vegetation diaspores: while animal-fruit interactions were resilient in burned forests and edges, secondary animal-seed interactions were impacted by fire. These results suggest that disturbed forests may require more than a decade to recover their interactions fully.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.