SynthesisDysphagia2026
The Impact of Nasogastric Tubes (NGTs) on Swallow Function in Adults with Post-stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nasogastric Tubes (NGTs) are a first-line treatment for delivering short-term nutrition to stroke survivors with dysphagia. However, the impact of NGTs on swallowing function itself is not yet well understood, despite the clinical importance of understanding this relationship to guide NGT treatment decisions. This review examined current evidence on the effects of NGTs on swallowing function in this population, focusing on five outcomes of interest: overall swallowing function, penetration/aspiration, oral and pharyngeal transit times and pharyngeal residue. A systematic search of terms related to stroke, dysphagia and NGTs across four major databases identified 1099 records. Eight full-text articles met inclusion criteria, of which seven were a pre-post design and one was a randomised control trial. Sample sizes of included studies ranged from 21 to 147 participants and median ages were between 66.0 ± 8.5 to 73.2 ± 12.4 years. Other participant characteristics, such as time with NGT in situ, time since stroke and NGT type, were inconsistently reported. Six studies used an instrumental swallowing evaluation to evaluate change between conditions, however, significant methodological heterogeneity between studies was evident in the inclusion criteria and assessment methods reported. Data synthesis suggested the following trends when an NGT is present: greater overall dysphagia severity, longer pharyngeal transit times, increased severity of penetration/aspiration, higher rates of pneumonia and increased volume of pharyngeal residue. However, most studies had a moderate-high risk of bias (n = 7), limiting the strength of conclusions. More methodologically robust research is needed to clarify the impact of NGTs on swallowing physiology and inform clinical management of dysphagia in stroke survivors requiring an NGT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.