Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41874622›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Automatic framework for evaluating osteoarthritic cartilage severity: high-resolution cartilage thickness mapping and scoring.

Paul Margain, Patrick Omoumi, Julien Favre

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul MargainLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, BioMotion Center, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patrick OmoumiLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne, Switzerland. Patrick.Omoumi@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3251-3666
Julien FavreLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, BioMotion Center, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung CRSII--222725Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung CRSII5_177155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate an automatic, scalable framework for assessing the femoro-tibial osteoarthritic cartilage severity using high-resolution cartilage thickness maps (CTh-Maps) and a CTh-Score. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe osteoarthritis initiative (OAI) cohort of 4796 subjects was analysed. A 3D-UNet was trained to segment femoro-tibial bones and cartilages using MRI from baseline, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 6-, and 8-year follow-ups. CTh-Maps were created for each knee. A ResNet model trained on CTh-Maps assigned a CTh-Score ranging from 0 (healthy cartilage) to 100 (end-stage OA). The reproducibility of the CTh-Score was evaluated in a test/retest setup. Its validity was assessed by examining the correlation with expert evaluations of cartilage loss (MOAKS grading) and association with OA severity (KL grade) in both OAI and an external dataset. The CTh-Score sensitivity to OA structural progression was examined.

resultsThe framework generated CTh-Maps for the entire OAI, forming the "OAI CTh-Maps" dataset. Both CTh-Maps and CTh-Score showed excellent reproducibility (ICC > 0.98). The CTh-Score demonstrated strong correlations (r = 0.81) with expert assessments of cartilage loss and strong associations to OA severity, including in the external dataset. The CTh-Score either increased or remained stable for almost all subjects at 8-year follow-up. The CTh-Score showed great sensitivity to change, significantly increasing between each timepoint, up to 6 years prior to KL progression.

conclusionsCTh-Maps and CTh-Score represent a novel approach to analysing cartilage at imaging. Their scalability, reproducibility and sensitivity to osteoarthritic cartilage severity provide significant opportunities for earlier OA detection, better disease monitoring, and therapeutic window identification. Project page:  https://lausannekneestudy.org/cthscore/ Dataset link:  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18745638 . KEY POINTS: Question Enhanced imaging biomarkers are needed in osteoarthritis research, but current methods present limitations in assessing variable cartilage degeneration and lack scalability. Findings This study introduces an automatic framework for the evaluation of osteoarthritic cartilage severity through the generation of CTh-Maps and the CTh-Score. Clinical relevance The scalability and sensitivity of CTh-Maps and CTh-Score in assessing osteoarthritic cartilage severity create new opportunities for clinical trials, both in the screening phase (identifying progressors) and in treatment evaluation (serving as biomarkers for disease structural progression).

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularMagnetic Resonance ImagingOsteoarthritis, KneeAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexCartilageDeep learningKnee osteoarthritisMappingScoring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.