ArticleIntensive care medicine2026
Clinical criteria for the definition of refractory septic shock: a joint Delphi consensus from the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07715110 (Biological and Immunomodulatory Effect of Hemoadsorption With Macroporous Resin Cartridges in Septic Shock and Refractory Septic Shock Two Parallel Open-label Randomized Pilot Trials.), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Biological and Immunomodulatory Effect of Hemoadsorption With Macroporous Resin Cartridges in Septic Shock and Refractory Septic Shock Two Parallel Open-label Randomized Pilot Trials.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward very early vasopressin use in septic shock: observational data accumulate but trial evidence still lacking.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular adrenoceptors physiology in patients with shock.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- The Same Instrument, Differently Tuned? Surveys, Delphi Studies, and the Search for Structured Disagreement.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- The role of hemoadsorption in septic shock: toward a personalized approach.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Five things the intensivist cannot forget in the management of septic shock.Critical care science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
65 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA definition of refractory septic shock is necessary to guide diagnosis, management, prognostication, research, and future guidelines for this most severe form of the disease. We sought to achieve consensus on clinical criteria that would be used to define refractory septic shock.
designReview of literature, expert panel position statements, and Delphi rounds with an international expert group.
settingConsensus was defined as having at least 75% of panellists in agreement or disagreement on the three highest or lowest levels of a 7-point Likert scale or based on responses to single- or multiple-choice questions, respectively. SUBJECTS: A panel of multinational, multiprofessional, and multidisciplinary critical care experts assembled by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (57 invitations and 56 participants). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsA five-round Delphi process was conducted for consensus and stability. The steering committee proposed 34 statements, and five of them were rejected by panel experts after round 2. Among 29 statements selected from eight domains, consensus was reached for 13. The panel agreed on the need for a comprehensive consensus set of clinical criteria for refractory septic shock. Markers of organ dysfunction (75%, 2 rounds), tissue perfusion (91.1%, 2 rounds) including lactate (94.6%, 2 rounds) and capillary refill time (76.8%, 2 rounds), assessment of fluid responsiveness after initial resuscitation (92.9%, 5 rounds), and use of vasoactive drugs at norepinephrine equivalents greater than 0.5 µg/kg/min (75.0%, 3 rounds) were selected as clinical criteria of refractory septic shock. The use of critical care ultrasound (CCUS) (92.9%, 3 rounds) was the single diagnostic modality that reached a consensus-based agreement.
conclusionsA consensus for 13 criteria to frame the definition of refractory septic shock was reached. Refractory septic shock is characterised by persistently elevated lactate concentrations and or prolonged capillary refill time in patients with septic shock who are fluid unresponsive, require a norepinephrine base equivalent dose greater than 0.5 µg per kilogram per minute, and undergo CCUS assessment when mixed shock is suspected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41874620What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.