Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41874602›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2026

[Management of pericardial tamponade in the electrophysiology laboratory].

Laura Rottner

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Fluoroscopic guidance in electrophysiological procedures].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Laura RottnerRhythmologie, Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60598, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland. laura.rottner@herz-frankfurt.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter ablation is an established treatment method for various types of cardiac arrhythmias and generally exhibits a high success rate and an excellent safety profile. However, despite increasing experience and improved ablation strategies and technologies, potentially life-threatening complications can occur. Pericardial tamponade is the most common serious complication in electrophysiological interventions and requires immediate, coordinated, and effective treatment. The following article summarized the incidence, risk factors, and potential causes of peri-interventional pericardial effusion or tamponade during electrophysiological interventions and discusses strategies for prevention and complication management.

Indexed as

Cardiac TamponadeCatheter AblationPericardiocentesisEvidence-Based MedicineHumansTreatment OutcomeComplication managementComplication preventionInterventional electrophysiologyPunctureTamponade

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.