Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41874591›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

Can you hear me? House sparrow auditory processing differs across an urbanization gradient.

Linda A Nduwimana, Sarah E Grimes, Brian Yurk, Kelly L Ronald

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Cut through the noise: vocal signals and auditory processing vary along an urbanization gradient in Pacific treefrogs.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda A NduwimanaDepartment of Biology, Hope College, 35 East 12th Street, Holland, MI, 49423, USA.
Sarah E GrimesDepartment of Biology, Hope College, 35 East 12th Street, Holland, MI, 49423, USA.
Brian YurkDepartment of Mathematics & Statistics, Hope College, 27 Graves Place, Holland, MI, 49423, USA.
Kelly L RonaldDepartment of Biology, Hope College, 35 East 12th Street, Holland, MI, 49423, USA. ronald@hope.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3400-3018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanization alters both the physical and sensory environments of habitats and has the potential to affect animal communication. While the challenges faced by signalers in urban environments are increasingly understood, far less is known about how urbanization influences the physiology or behavior of sensory receivers. Here, we examined the relationship between urbanization and auditory sensitivity of house sparrows (Passer domesticus), a human-commensal songbird that inhabits environments spanning a rural–urban gradient. We used auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to assess hearing sensitivity across individuals captured at sites differing in urbanization. We predicted that urban-living would be associated with frequency-dependent changes in auditory sensitivity. In particular, we expected that urban sparrows may have greater high-frequency sensitivity compared to their rural counterparts, consistent with reported shifts in urban song structure. Overall, our results showed mixed support for this prediction. Increased levels of urbanization were associated with lower hearing sensitivity and greater delays in the ABR but the exact magnitude and direction of these effects depended on how urbanization was quantified, the sex of the individual, and the features of the acoustic stimulus. These changes in auditory processing with urbanization may reflect a communication cost to sensory receivers or, alternatively, a mechanism for avoiding noise masking. These findings are some of the first evidence in songbirds that the sensory physiology of receivers, not just signalers, can be impacted by human activity.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHearingSparrowsUrbanizationAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory AcuityAuditory ThresholdFemaleMaleVocalization, AnimalAuditory brainstem responseAuditory thresholdsCommunicationUrban ecology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.