Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41874551›Full record

ArticleThe journal of adhesive dentistry2026

Effect of the Design and Exposure Mode of Different Multiple-Peak Light-Curing Units on Light Emission, Temperature Rise, and Intraoral Access.

Maria Tereza Hordones Ribeiro, Guilherme Mendonça Benoni, Maribí Isomar Terán Lozada, Airin Karelys Avendaño Rondon, Gisele Rodrigues da Silva, Carlos José Soares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of adhesive dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Tereza Hordones Ribeiro
Guilherme Mendonça Benoni
Maribí Isomar Terán Lozada
Airin Karelys Avendaño Rondon
Gisele Rodrigues da Silva
Carlos José Soares

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo measure the tip diameter (mm) and the ability to cover the anterior and posterior large restorations, radiant power (mW), radiant exitance (mW/cm2), emission spectrum (mW/cm2/nm), radiant exposure (J/cm2), the effect of the design on the access to the mouth posterior region, the temperature rise inside the pulp of three light-curing units (LCUs) and a new LCU available in the Brazil. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four LCUs that cost over US$900, three well-established (Bluephase G2, Ivoclar Vivadent; VALO Grand, Ultradent; and VALO Cordless, Ultradent), and a new LCU (Quazar, FGM) were tested in standard mode (20 s for all LCUs), high mode (3 s for VALO Cordless, 5 s for Quazar, and 20 s for Bluephase G2), and Xtra power mode (3 s for VALO Grand). The radiant power (mW) and emission spectrum (mW/nm) were measured using an integrating sphere connected to a fiberoptic spectroradiometer. The internal tip diameter (mm) of each LCU was measured using a digital caliper and was used to calculate the radiant exitance (mW/cm2). Radiant exitance profiles at the light tip were measured using a laser beam profiler. The radiant exposure (J/cm2) was calculated. The in vitro temperature rise produced by LCUs inside the pulp cavity of molar teeth was measured using a thermocouple. The mouth access of the LCU tip on the occlusal surface of the first mandibular molar tooth with two mouth openings of 25 mm and 45 mm at the incisors was evaluated. The cost of each LCU in Brazil was correlated with internal tip diameter, radiant power, and radiant exitance.

resultsAll the LCUs were multiple-peak LCUs, and a uniform output. Quazar, VALO Cordless, and VALO Grand could maintain a perpendicular position regardless of mouth interincisal opening, while the Bluephase G2 required a tip angulation of 31.6 degrees at the 25 mm interincisal opening. The VALO Grand and VALO Cordless produced the highest temperature rise in standard mode ( 2.5°C), while in high mode, all LCUs produced lower temperature increases that use 5 s for Quazar and 3 s for VALO Grand and VALO Cordless, except for Bluephase G2, which produced a higher temperature rise ( 2.0°C) when activated for 20 s. There was a positive correlation between the cost of these LCUs and their averaged radiant power, diameter and the radiant exitance.

conclusionsThe LCUs tested emit light in the blue and violet spectra, characterizing them as multiple peaks. The temperature increases in the produced pulp remained within safe thermal limits ( 2.5°C), although standard-mode exposures produced higher pulp temperature rises. Bluephase G2 created higher angulation at 25 mm of interincisal mouth opening. The Quazar LCU produced a light output that was comparable to that from leading LCUs.

Indexed as

Body TemperatureCuring Lights, DentalLight-Curing of Dental AdhesivesBrazilDental PulpEquipment DesignHumansLightTemperaturebeam profileirradiancelight-curing unitmultiple peakradiant exposure

Identifiers

PMID41874551
PMCPMC13022565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.