ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Serious Infection in Crohn's Disease Patients Treated With Ustekinumab: US Food and Drug Administration Active Postmarket Risk Identification and Analysis in the Sentinel Initiative.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) used an Active Postmarket Risk Identification and Analysis (ARIA) system to address a safety issue (serious infection) identified during clinical review of an application to market ustekinumab as a treatment for Crohn's disease (CD). FDA used an active-comparator new-user cohort design, data from six Sentinel Data Partners, a method developed in Sentinel for identifying serious infection, and ARIA analytic tools to estimate serious infection incidence in adult CD patients during treatment with ustekinumab or an active comparator (infliximab, adalimumab, or vedolizumab). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to control for baseline differences between treatment groups. Analyses compared ustekinumab and comparator cohorts with 15,490 and 51,503 patients, respectively. The primary composite outcome of serious infection or COVID-19 occurred in 747 ustekinumab patients (4.82 %; 44.1 per 1000 patient-years) during mean 400-day follow-up. IPTW proportional hazard (Cox) regression estimated risk in the ustekinumab cohort vs. active comparator with hazard ratio 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.80-0.96). Findings were similar (a) according to line of therapy (use or non-use of an advanced inflammatory bowel disease therapy during a 183-day baseline period) and (b) before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional analyses excluded large magnitude risks from ustekinumab for major types of serious infection. In conclusion, IPTW analyses excluded large magnitude risks from ustekinumab for serious infection. This report describes the first ARIA study to use complex confounding adjustment to help resolve a safety issue identified during FDA review of a marketing application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.