Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41874414›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2026

Sex chromosome turnover and structural genome divergence shape meiotic outcomes in hybridizing Cobitis.

Stephen A Schlebusch, Vladimir Trifonov, Zuzana Halenková, Marharyta Klianitskaya, Dmitrij Dedukh, Aurora Ruiz-Herrera, Lucia Álvarez-González, Gala Pujol, Eva Hřibová, Lucija Andjel and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Differences in Early Development between Parental Species and Asexual Hybrids forms of European Spined Loaches (GenusSexual development : genetics, molecular biology, evolution, endocrinology, embryology, and pathology of sex determination and differentiation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Stephen A SchlebuschDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2355-2652
Vladimir TrifonovLaboratory of Non-Mendelian Evolution, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, 27721 Liběchov, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0454-8359
Zuzana HalenkováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8550-1693
Marharyta KlianitskayaInstitute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0009-0000-8631-2838
Dmitrij DedukhLaboratory of Non-Mendelian Evolution, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, 27721 Liběchov, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1152-813X
Aurora Ruiz-HerreraGenome Integrity and Instability Group, Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina (IBB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Cerdanyola del Vallès 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3868-6151
Lucia Álvarez-GonzálezGenome Integrity and Instability Group, Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina (IBB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Cerdanyola del Vallès 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8154-8614
Gala PujolGenome Integrity and Instability Group, Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina (IBB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Cerdanyola del Vallès 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3915-4766
Eva HřibováInstitute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 31, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Lucija AndjelLaboratory of Non-Mendelian Evolution, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, 27721 Liběchov, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5708-1433
Oldřich BartošLaboratory of Non-Mendelian Evolution, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, 27721 Liběchov, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5441-5592
Petr PajerInstitute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8706-9371
Tomáš TichopádLaboratory of Non-Mendelian Evolution, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, 27721 Liběchov, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9154-2969
Daniel KulikLaboratory of Non-Mendelian Evolution, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, 27721 Liběchov, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1268-5409
Jan KotuszMuseum of Natural History, University of Wrocław, Henryka Sienkiewicza 21, 50335 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6229-7610
Marie Kaštánková DoležálkováLaboratory of Non-Mendelian Evolution, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, 27721 Liběchov, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7002-6201
Astrid BöhneCentre for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Leibniz-Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1284-3115
Anatolie MartaLaboratory of Non-Mendelian Evolution, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, 27721 Liběchov, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4457-8838
Patrik HornaLaboratory of Non-Mendelian Evolution, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, 27721 Liběchov, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7337-5899
Radka ReifováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5852-5174
Yann GuiguenINRAE, LPGP, Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5464-6219
Heiner KuhlLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7623-9227
Jan PačesInstitute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3059-6127
Karel JankoLaboratory of Non-Mendelian Evolution, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, 27721 Liběchov, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7866-4937

Funding

AGAUR 2021SGR00122Charles University 314222Charles University UNCE/24/SCI/006Czech Science Foundation 21-25185SCzech Science Foundation 24-12217SEuropean Union 101081195FPI PRE-2018-083257FPI PRE-C-2021-0083ICREAInstitute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AS CR RVO67985904Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic 539Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation PID2020-112557GB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHybridization between divergent species can result in meiotic aberrations and the emergence of asexual reproduction. Yet, it remains poorly understood to what extent such outcomes arise from genome-wide incompatibilities versus more specific conflicts among individual chromosomes inherited from parental species, including their ability to pair during meiosis in hybrids. It is also unclear how interspecific hybrids cope with differences in sex determination systems, particularly in the context of increased ploidy. Addressing these questions requires high-quality, chromosome-level reference genomes of the parental species involved in hybrid formation.

findingsHere, we present the first chromosome-level genome assemblies for three hybridizing Cobitis species (C. elongatoides, C. taenia, and C. tanaitica), providing a comprehensive framework for investigating the genomic and cytogenetic basis of hybrid sterility and the transition to asexuality. By integrating genome scaffolding, male/female pooled sequencing (Pool-Seq), and molecular cytogenetics, we uncover extensive structural variation among homologous chromosomes of the three species, despite overall karyotype conservation. Population-level analyses revealed that each species possesses distinct, non-homologous sex chromosomes, highlighting rapid sex chromosome turnover in this recently diverged lineage. Finally, the design of chromosome-specific painting probes, which we applied to meiotic metaphase I spreads of diploid hybrids. This approach revealed striking differences in the pairing success of orthologous chromosomes.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that individual orthologous chromosomes differ markedly in their ability to form bivalents during meiosis in hybrids, indicating that hybrid meiotic behaviour is shaped by chromosome-specific incompatibilities rather than uniform genome-wide failure. We also found that even closely related parental species possess distinct, non-homologous sex chromosomes, highlighting rapid turnover of sex determination systems in hybridizing lineages. Together, these findings provide a high-resolution genomic and cytogenetic framework to explore how the architecture of inherited parental genomes influences sex-specific reproductive outcomes in hybrids-ranging from male sterility to the establishment of fertile, clonally reproducing female lineages-and how such asymmetries may contribute to the emergence of asexuality in vertebrates.

Indexed as

CypriniformesGenomeHybridization, GeneticMeiosisSex ChromosomesAnimalsFemaleasexual reproductionchromosome evolutionchromosome-specific incompatibilitieshybrid sterilityloachespolyploidysex determinationspeciation

Identifiers

PMID41874414
PMCPMC13175044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.