ReviewInfection and immunity2026
Gut microbiota impact on lung diseases: a mini review of clinical evidence.
Review in Infection and immunity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Gut-Lung Microbiome Crosstalk and Pulmonary Disease.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Aging and Viral Respiratory Infections: Focus on Vitamin D and Microbiota.BioMed research international · 2026Review
- Childhood asthma and the microbiome: from gut-lung axis mechanisms to precision prevention strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gut-lung axis represents a bidirectional communication network through which the gut microbiota (GM) influences respiratory health. This mini-review synthesizes clinical evidence on the role of the GM in lung diseases. We focused exclusively on human clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews, sourced from major databases after duplicate removal. The evidence indicates that GM dysbiosis is a significant risk factor for the susceptibility and severity of various respiratory conditions, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis (CF), and infections, such as COVID-19 and pneumonia. Specific microbial signatures and metabolic profiles, particularly involving short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), are associated with disease states and outcomes. Interventions like probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) show promise in modulating the GM and improving clinical parameters, though their efficacy can be inconsistent and influenced by confounding factors. In conclusion, the GM is a promising therapeutic target for lung diseases. However, future research must prioritize large-scale, longitudinal clinical trials and deeper mechanistic investigations to establish causality and develop effective, personalized microbiome-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.