Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41874148›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2026

Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Occupational Therapy on Changes in Upper Extremity Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (Armeo X-over Trial): Study Protocol of a Randomised Crossover Trial.

Chantal Wunderlin, Flavia Bürgisser, Armin Gemperli, Claudio Perret, Mario Widmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chantal WunderlinNeuro-Musculoskeletal Functioning and Mobility Group, Swiss Paraplegic Research, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0008-5218-4311
Flavia BürgisserDepartment of Therapy, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.
Armin GemperliFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, 6005 Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2363-0625
Claudio PerretNeuro-Musculoskeletal Functioning and Mobility Group, Swiss Paraplegic Research, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3953-589X
Mario WidmerNeuro-Musculoskeletal Functioning and Mobility Group, Swiss Paraplegic Research, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7693-123X

Funding

Research Commission of the Swiss Paraplegic Foundation Foko_2023_02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robot-assisted therapy (RT) is increasingly implemented in rehabilitation, yet evidence on its effectiveness in improving upper extremity function after cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) remains limited. Therefore, this randomised crossover study aims to investigate the effects of unilateral RT compared to conventional unilateral occupational therapy (OT) on upper extremity function in individuals with cSCI. 40 participants with traumatic or non-traumatic cSCI (16-81 days post-injury, neurological level of injury: C1-T1) will be randomised (1:1), stratified by their predicted recovery profile, to receive 6 weeks of RT (ArmeoSpring) and 6 weeks of OT in random order, each 3 × 30 min/week in addition to the clinical routine therapy. Assessments are conducted before (t

Indexed as

occupational therapyquadriplegiarehabilitationroboticsspinal cord injuryupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID41874148
PMCPMC13010677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.