Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41874125›Full record

ReviewJournal of xenobiotics2026

Toward Comprehensive In Vitro Evaluation of Serum Albumin Binding of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.

Hannah M Starnes, Scott M Belcher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of xenobiotics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hannah M StarnesDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Scott M BelcherDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1196-3705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) constitute a large and chemically diverse class of synthetic compounds characterized by one or more fully fluorinated methyl or methylene groups. Many PFAS are toxic, environmentally persistent, bioaccumulative, and highly mobile, resulting in widespread contamination and biological exposure. Across taxa PFAS exhibit affinity for proteins and preferentially accumulates in protein-rich, highly perfused tissues. Protein binding critically influences PFAS distribution, bioaccumulation, toxicity, and elimination. A variety of different approaches for determining bind affinity have existed for decades; however, depending on experimental conditions, calculated affinities can vary over multiple orders of magnitude which limits comparison of protein-PFAS binding affinities across studies and across PFAS chemical space. Addressing this limitation requires robust and standardized experimental platforms capable of rapidly generating quantitative binding data. Among the most important targets is serum albumin-the principal transport protein in vertebrate blood-which plays a central role in governing PFAS toxicokinetics. This review summarizes current methodologies for measuring protein-PFAS binding affinities, evaluates the strengths and limitations of each approach, synthesizes the existing literature on serum albumin-PFAS interactions, and highlights differential scanning fluorimetry as a rapid, reproducible, and sensitive technique for in vitro assessment of relative protein-PFAS binding.

Indexed as

binding affinitydifferential scanning fluorimetryPFASthermal shift

Identifiers

PMID41874125
PMCPMC13010723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.