Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41874119›Full record

ReviewJournal of xenobiotics2026

Cyclophosphamide-Induced Nephrotoxicity and Nephroprotection in Rodent Models: A Systematic Review and Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2010-2025).

Denis Oberiukhtin, Anton Chernitskiy, Desheng Hu, Alexey Sarapultsev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of xenobiotics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Denis OberiukhtinInstitute of Immunology and Physiology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 106 Pervomaiskaya Street, Ekaterinburg 620049, Russia.ORCID 0009-0006-1497-5740
Anton ChernitskiyUral Federal Agrarian Scientific Research Centre, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 112A Ulitsa Belinskogo, Ekaterinburg 620061, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8953-687X
Desheng HuDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430022, China.
Alexey SarapultsevInstitute of Immunology and Physiology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 106 Pervomaiskaya Street, Ekaterinburg 620049, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3101-9655

Funding

Institute of Immunology and Physiology Theme No. 122020900136-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclophosphamide (CP) is extensively used in oncology and as an immunosuppressant, but dose-limiting renal injury remains a major constraint. We systematically reviewed in vivo rodent models of CP nephrotoxicity (2010-2025) and meta-analysed core outcomes while separating the model effect (CP vs. control) from the treatment effect (intervention + CP vs. CP-only). Fifty-four studies met eligibility criteria, and random-effects syntheses were feasible for serum creatinine, serum urea, and renal oxidative stress markers. CP produced a marked functional deterioration, increasing serum creatinine by 1.059 mg/dL (95% CI 0.517-1.601;

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryapoptosiscyclophosphamideinflammationmeta-analysisnephroprotectionnephrotoxicityoxidative stressrodent modelssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41874119
PMCPMC13010739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.