Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41874117›Full record

ReviewJournal of xenobiotics2026

Pesticide Behavior in Soil Amended with Agricultural Waste and Agro-Industrial Byproducts: An Updated Review.

Gabriel Pérez-Lucas, Simón Navarro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of xenobiotics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabriel Pérez-LucasDepartment of Agricultural Chemistry, Geology and Pedology, School of Chemistry, University of Murcia, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, E-30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4799-3551
Simón NavarroDepartment of Agricultural Chemistry, Geology and Pedology, School of Chemistry, University of Murcia, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, E-30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0543-7928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Farmers rely on pesticides to keep their crops safe from pests, diseases, and weeds. However, if pesticides are not used properly, they can have serious consequences for human and environmental health. Many pesticides are not easily biodegradable and persist in the environment for a long time. Their residues, including toxic metabolites, pose risks to non-target organisms, contaminate surface- and groundwater sources, and may affect future crops. Among other soil remediation actions, it is important to highlight the impact of agricultural waste and agro-industrial byproducts on the behavior of pesticides as a strategy to eliminate or at least minimize soil pollution by their residues. Waste from various food industries and agriculture poses a severe threat to the ecosystem and is difficult to manage properly. Agriculture and food production waste accounts for over 30% of total global agricultural output. Therefore, managing agri-food waste from different sources is crucial to promoting sustainable development with minimal environmental impact. Key components of waste management interventions in the agricultural circular and bioeconomy include incorporating crop residues and food waste into soils. For these reasons, we present an updated review of the impact of agricultural waste and agro-industrial byproducts on the behavior of pesticides in soil. The goal of this review is to promote the sustainable use of these wastes within the context of a circular economy.

Indexed as

agricultural wasteagri-food byproductspesticide residuessoil remediationsustainable development

Identifiers

PMID41874117
PMCPMC13010699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.