ArticleAudiology research2026
The Influence of Hearing Aid Type on Reading: Results of an Eye-Tracking Study at University.
Article in Audiology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe study examines the characteristics of reading written texts depending on the type of hearing aid (monaural or binaural) and the individual hearing compensatory device used (cochlear implant or hearing aid) by students studying engineering fields of study in inclusive higher education.
methodsThe identification of the students' characteristics while reading was carried out using an eye-tracker.
resultsThe data obtained by eye-tracking technology indicate that there are no significant differences in the gaze point indicators when reading everyday text between students with binaural hearing aids and students without hearing impairments. At the same time, students with monaural cochlear implants showed different gaze point indicators when reading everyday text compared to the results of groups of students without hearing impairments and students with binaural hearing aids. Significant differences were found in indicators related to pupil diameter, in particular between the groups of students with monaural cochlear implants and students with binaural hearing aids.
conclusionsThe results demonstrate the need to adapt written teaching materials not only to take into account the characteristics caused by the hearing impairment itself, but also to take into account individual characteristics caused by the type of hearing aid. However, given the small sample size (13-14 people in each group) and multiple variables included (types of devices and number), the results should be interpreted with caution and considered preliminary-additional studies involving a larger number of participants are needed to confirm the identified patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.