ReviewNeuroSci2026
Prevalence and Clinical Features of Vestibular Migraine in Different Age Groups: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in NeuroSci, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVestibular migraine (VM) is a frequent but underdiagnosed cause of episodic vertigo, characterized by vestibular symptoms often accompanied by migrainous features. Despite its relatively high prevalence, diagnosis remains clinically challenging and may differ depending on the diagnostic criteria used. This systematic review evaluates VM prevalence and clinical features across age groups to improve recognition and guide age-appropriate management.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. This research was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, and Embase. Two independent reviewers screened studies by title and abstract, and a separate pair screened full texts. Eligible studies were observational and reported prevalence or clinical features of VM.
resultsA total of 874 publications were identified, leading to the review of 21 studies. Prevalence of VM varied widely, ranging from 6% to 35% in children and 2.7% to 40.9% in adults. Pooled prevalence across studies was 19% overall, 25% in children, and 14% in adults. Among patients with vertigo, the pooled prevalence was higher at 26%, with 33% in children and 18% in adults. Vertigo was the most consistent symptom in both age groups, and female predominance was observed in all age groups. Prevalence variability likely reflects diversity in applied diagnostic criteria and study design across included studies.
conclusionVM is a common cause of vertigo, particularly in pediatric populations. Age-specific clinical features highlight the need for tailored diagnostic and management strategies. Future research should focus on large-scale prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.