ReviewNeuroSci2026
Slowly Expanding Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in NeuroSci, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial for the Special Issue "Cognitive Impairment and Neuropsychiatric Dysfunctions in Multiple Sclerosis (Volume II)".NeuroSci · 2026Article
- Astrocytes in Multiple Sclerosis: Getting to the Core.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSlowly expanding lesions (SELs) have been introduced as a radiological marker of chronic active demyelination and smoldering inflammation. These lesions are recognized as indicators of disability worsening and brain atrophy in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). We aimed to provide an overview of the available evidence on the prevalence and clinical relevance of SELs in PwMS.
methodsPubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched up to 25 May 2025, to identify studies evaluating SELs in PwMS. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We conducted a thorough review to evaluate the clinical relevance of SELs in MS. Additionally, a meta-analysis was performed using R software to estimate the pooled prevalence of SELs in MS.
resultsTwenty studies on 4970 PwMS met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis indicated that the pooled prevalence of SELs in PwMS was 57.1% (95% CI: 44.9% to 69.3%). Moreover, the systematic review showed that SELs were associated with chronic neuroinflammation, ongoing demyelination, disability, microstructural damage, and axonal degeneration. Intervention studies also indicated that the number and volume of SELs were decreased following the administration of disease-modifying therapies.
conclusionsSELs are revealed to affect around half of PwMS and are associated with disability and disease progression in MS. These results highlight the potential role of SELs as a critical radiomarker in MS. However, future studies are warranted to validate these preliminary findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.