ReviewNeuroSci2026
Beyond Hyperexcitability: A Review of Neural Mechanisms in Charles Bonnet Syndrome.
Review in NeuroSci, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS) is characterized by complex visual hallucinations in visually impaired individuals who maintain intact cognitive function. Despite significant progress in understanding this condition, the precise neural mechanisms underlying CBS remain incompletely understood. This review synthesizes current evidence regarding the pathophysiology of CBS, with particular emphasis on emerging neurobiological models that extend beyond simple cortical hyperexcitability. Recent neuroimaging, neurophysiological, and computational modeling studies suggest that CBS hallucinations may arise from complex interactions among deafferentation-induced neural plasticity, neurotransmitter imbalances, and altered functional connectivity within visual processing hierarchies. The evidence increasingly points toward a model involving desynchronization between bottom-up and top-down visual processing pathways, rather than mere hyperexcitability of deafferented visual cortex. This integrated perspective has important implications for both the theoretical understanding of visual perception and the development of targeted therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.