Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41874034›Full record

ReviewNeuroSci2026

Beyond Hyperexcitability: A Review of Neural Mechanisms in Charles Bonnet Syndrome.

Eric Altieri, Luca Battaglini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroSci, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric AltieriNeuro.Vis.U.S. Laboratory, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-7424-2386
Luca BattagliniNeuro.Vis.U.S. Laboratory, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5187-9225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS) is characterized by complex visual hallucinations in visually impaired individuals who maintain intact cognitive function. Despite significant progress in understanding this condition, the precise neural mechanisms underlying CBS remain incompletely understood. This review synthesizes current evidence regarding the pathophysiology of CBS, with particular emphasis on emerging neurobiological models that extend beyond simple cortical hyperexcitability. Recent neuroimaging, neurophysiological, and computational modeling studies suggest that CBS hallucinations may arise from complex interactions among deafferentation-induced neural plasticity, neurotransmitter imbalances, and altered functional connectivity within visual processing hierarchies. The evidence increasingly points toward a model involving desynchronization between bottom-up and top-down visual processing pathways, rather than mere hyperexcitability of deafferented visual cortex. This integrated perspective has important implications for both the theoretical understanding of visual perception and the development of targeted therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Charles-Bonnet syndromecortical hyperexcitabilitypredictive processing theoryrelease phenomena

Identifiers

PMID41874034
PMCPMC13010627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.